leftea.blogg.se

1. FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 INSTALL
2. FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 UPDATE
3. FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 CODE
4. FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 PC

Those are just some things but what I've noticed that Chromium browsers don't do well and it's a really minor thing maybe but the ability to just one click zoom options.

Opera Gx kinda gave me some ideas for CSS that I could get help from /r/firefoxcss. Much easier to setup since it can be used in more things and not just browsers. Vivaldi was cool because gestures are very helpful but now I opt for using my g600 for browsing. A bit weird like that but it helps me out figuring out the things that I want in browsers. I've always had multiple browsers installed since sometimes something breaks and I want to try something new.

FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 PC

Free Agent on the pc in the closet that would auto-dialup at 10pm and disconnect at 7am cough. While we're talking about throwbacks, Eudora for email. Does anyone else remember this or was it from a methed out fever dream? Same general color palette as the wheel loading screen. I recall one of the old Netscapes having some awesome loading screen with an entire galleon and twinkling stars iirc, not just the spinning ship wheel. My old profile (without cache) was 2.74 GB, my new fully configured profile (without cache) is 181 MB. There were all sorts of old directory structures and config files that are deprecated and have been completely reworked, seven years of addons that have been abandoned, with their data in /Profile// as was apparently the method at one point.

FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 INSTALL

I made a new firefox profile recently-the old one I'd been carrying from install to install had timestamps going back to 2015. Since Netscape Navigator in the 90s, if that counts? I used Maxathon (IE with a wrapper) in the early '00s at some point for several months during some issue with Netscape, I don't recall the specifics, but when the issue was resolved I switched back. Firefox has quite the opportunity as Chrome starts to abuse its position. One browser (Chrome) dominates the web and as tried multiple attempts to insert proprietary lock-in to webstandards and user features. Now we are kind of back where we started.

FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 CODE

Firefox impressively made the transition, but not until losing a ton of marketshare to Chome due to tons of advertising and faster Chrome performance (they didn't have the legacy code to refactor). Chrome was released around this time and Firefox had some tech pain to re-architect for a more resource demanding web, faster releases, and a mobile non-desktop internet. Then there was an explosion of other browsers that could make use of standardized components. Firefox reached its peak influence around 2009-10 when it had finally broken down the IE only web. Still Firefox fought a long a slow battle against Internet Explorer and slowly standardizing proprietary IE web functions. Furthermore, internet usage has gone up worldwide, so a declining marketshare might not represent as huge of a user loss at it might seem but still represents a declining influence. Its important to see who is reporting the data, how they have collected it, and what (if any) normalization they have tried.

FIREFOX DEVELOPER EDITION REDDIT 2018 UPDATE

But would also undercount those who are so privacy conscious they turn off even automated update checks to the download servers and other background Mozilla maintaince services.Īll in all, its not really possible to be totally accurate. That would overcount some on virtual installs, or multiple versions of FF like release/beta/nightly on the same computer, or those who have it installed but don't use it as their main browser. That said, Mozilla has pretty decent info about install count that they can check from their servers getting hit with update pings. Just getting info from a few sites (even ones with a ton of traffic), is going to have a heavy selection bias. In theory you could check the user agent logs of tons of website servers, but then you have to get a ton of webmasters to agree and setup the infrastructure. Marketers don't really care about the discrepancy too much, because ad-blocking users are not really relevant to them. So just the sort of thing that various tracking and anti-ad measures would block Most of these are run by various marketing networks and collected in addition to other information. Possibly js interactions with tracking cookies. The best analytics need to be collected from a very wide variety of sites.